26/10/07
Throughout last week, the team has been concentrating solely on the deliverables, which are to be handed in on the 31st Oct. The first thing that was done was to plan the literature survey. We set upon a set of titles for the survey and then took a section each and started to write. After a day of writing, the document and the different sections were edited together by Nick. Once this was edited together, the team wrote the introduction and conclusion and then the abstract. Once all this was together and the first draft was complete, the team read through it and made any changes that needed addressing. This was then sent to Claire Brierley before the meeting on Wednesday, so she could read through it and give us feed back.
The next stage was to write the rest of the deliverables. The academic pitch was written by Nick, this was then passed around the team for them to review and suggest any changes. After a lot of team meetings, where we discussed what we wanted to go in the design document James went and wrote the first draft. When this was complete and the team had reviewed what had been written, myself and Nick went and refined the document until we were satisfied that everything had been included. Finally, the milestones had to be decided upon. Nick had devised some milestone dates, which were discussed between the team and then document was written as a group
On 24th Oct we had a meeting with Claire Brierley who gave us advice about improving our literature survey and academic pitch. The recommendations were taken on board and we changed our literature survey and academic pitch accordingly.
On 25th Oct we had our team meeting with the supervisors. This meeting went very well as they were pleased with the progress we had made with our deliverables. Advice was given to us to improve the design document and plan. For more details, see the team blog.
For the next week, the aim is complete the improvements for the deliverables, and start to have team meetings as to how we aim to work towards the next milestone.
The next stage was to write the rest of the deliverables. The academic pitch was written by Nick, this was then passed around the team for them to review and suggest any changes. After a lot of team meetings, where we discussed what we wanted to go in the design document James went and wrote the first draft. When this was complete and the team had reviewed what had been written, myself and Nick went and refined the document until we were satisfied that everything had been included. Finally, the milestones had to be decided upon. Nick had devised some milestone dates, which were discussed between the team and then document was written as a group
On 24th Oct we had a meeting with Claire Brierley who gave us advice about improving our literature survey and academic pitch. The recommendations were taken on board and we changed our literature survey and academic pitch accordingly.
On 25th Oct we had our team meeting with the supervisors. This meeting went very well as they were pleased with the progress we had made with our deliverables. Advice was given to us to improve the design document and plan. For more details, see the team blog.
For the next week, the aim is complete the improvements for the deliverables, and start to have team meetings as to how we aim to work towards the next milestone.